Flickr

  • www.flickr.com
    Abiola_Lapite's photos More of Abiola_Lapite's photos

« Utterly Mad | Main | A Reality Check for China Boosters »

January 09, 2005

Fascist Metal

Heavy Metal being one of the few musical forms I've never been all that interested in (with only Country music being of less interest to me), I can't say that I've ever followed Rammstein's activities in any detail. To be sure, I'd heard all the rumors that there was something very ... "Teutonic" about the band, but I dismissed it as just your run of the mill guilt-by-association, with music that would be taken on its own terms elsewhere acquiring a sinister cast in the eyes of onlookers because of who happened to be singing it.

If this New York Times profile is to be believed, however, there's a lot more to the association than that: these guys have gone out of their way to flirt with Nazi imagery, even while denying that they're doing anything of the sort.

The members of Rammstein report themselves puzzled - and wounded - by the controversy over their music. So, too, with the uproar over their use of a clip from "Olympische Spiele" - a Leni Riefenstahl documentary commissioned by the Nazis in 1936 as "a song of praise to the ideals of National Socialism" - in one of their videos. They had, they said, used it only because it was so pretty.

Sure, right ...

At precisely 8 p.m, Exilia, the warm-up act, began, and the audience suffered it politely. Then the group left the stage, and a man beside me pulled out a pack of cigarettes and ripped off some filters to stuff in his ears. "Reise Reise," now the No. 1 German single, began with the sound of lonely waves and seagulls, an ominous warlike pounding, the primitive chanting of sailors on a galley. According to the band's official translation, the title means "Voyage Voyage." But it can also be translated as "Arise Arise," and that is how the audience took it.

A huge curtain dropped, revealing a row of massive Potemkin amplifiers that flashed with the band's insignia, something like a swastika. The guitarists descended from the ceiling like gods, and the audience was steamrollered by smashing drums, violent bass and the sound of a full choir, amplified to unspeakable levels.

[...]

Most compelling is its lead singer. Dressed in an imperial German military uniform, Mr. Lindemann gave off an air of such brute masculinity and barely contained violence that it seemed that he could have reached into the crowd, snatched up a fan, and bitten off his head. He commands a low, powerful bass rarely used in contemporary pop music, untrained but electrifying. The audience members, enthralled, began pumping their fists in the air.

The band then introduced one of its most notorious songs, "Links," with the sound of metrically precise, marching jackboots. Links means left, and the band claims this song is an expression of its left-wing sensibilities. The jackboots were followed by a furious chorus: "Links-Zwo-Drei-Vier! Links-Zwo-Drei-Vier!" ("Left-Two-Three-Four! Left-Two-Three-Four!") The German language lent itself to the powerful, rhythmic song. The keyboardist stomped about in a German military helmet. Mr. Lindemann performed an exaggerated goose step. The crowd shouted "Hi!" in unison, which sounded just different enough from "Heil" that the resemblance could be denied.

An "imperial German uniform": now that's subtlety for you! And what about all that "Reise! Reise!"* and "Hi!" business, or the goose stepping? These guys know what they're selling, and the audience knows it too: the thrill of playing with the ultimate taboo in a land where going any further would actually be illegal. I'm not saying that this makes Rammstein some sort of extreme-right group - playing with taboos has long been standard-fare throughout the English speaking world, hence the Sex Pistols and Marilyn Manson - but I think it's utterly disingenuous for them to pose as misunderstood martyrs whenever they're challenged about the associations they've gone out of their way to invoke.

*A German play on an English word ("Rise") to get around the taboo on using "Erwache" - very clever.

Comments

I'm utterly unconvinced about the association. If British and American heavy metal is allowed to cross all sorts of sexual/vampiric frontiers I see no particular reason why German heavy metal should not be accorded the same privilege. Or perhaps it's because I'm partial to Rammstein.

That's a bit of an incoherent criticism:

"""They had, they said, used it only because it was so pretty."

Sure, right ...""

and then

""I think it's utterly disingenuous for them to pose as misunderstood martyrs whenever they're challenged about the associations they've gone out of their way to invoke.""

They're either using old-school German imagery because they're fascist, or because they're not, and they like the aesthetics of it. If the latter, then „schöne“ is an appropriate word for them to use to describe it. No-one's suggesting that they endorse cannibalism based on the subject matter of „Mein Teil“ or that they're latent plane saboteurs based on the subject matter of „Rammstein“.

"No-one's suggesting that they endorse cannibalism based on the subject matter of „Mein Teil“ or that they're latent plane saboteurs based on the subject matter of „Rammstein“."

You'd have a point if that were the only Nazi allusion in their act, but that's hardly the case, is it? If someone keeps making overt and not so overt allusions to such a topic, I think one has every right to look suspiciously on the goings on.

There is a big National Socialist Black Metal Scene in Scandanavia, but Rammstein has never been connected to it at all. They play an entirely different subgenre of metal, and are fairly commercial by the standards of the the NSBM bands.

The thing is, people like that go out of their way to provoke criticism, and, when they're criticized (ideally as shrilly and incoherently as possible), it's what they want, BUT they can't admit it, because otherwise it would be transparently obvious that they're just trying to provoke criticism for base commercial reasons, so they're forced into the "why do you all hate poor innocents like us?" martyrdom pose by default.

The thing is, people like that go out of their way to provoke criticism, and, when they're criticized (ideally as shrilly and incoherently as possible), it's what they want, BUT they can't admit it, because otherwise it would be transparently obvious that they're just trying to provoke criticism for base commercial reasons, so they're forced into the "why do you all hate poor innocents like us?" martyrdom pose by default.

Julian, I think your take on it is probably the essence of the matter. It's all transparent posturing to help sell a few more records.

Country music: Hank Williams Sr.

Though it may be a purely subjective judgement I will stand on record as saying that anyone who listens to Hank and does not appreciate it really lacks taste.

I wrote about the Slovenian group Laibach, here . They had subversive intent in their deployal of fascist imagery, towards communist Yugoslavia and towards ethnic-German supremacism.

This article in the Times is very poorly researched. Given how little the so-called journalist knows on the subject, I believe their word can't be taken seriously. For example, the journalist says that their latest single "Reise, Reise" shot to number one in Europe.. "Reise, Reise" was in fact not their latest single, nor was it ever a single at all. There have been 3 singles from the new album, "Mein Teil," "Amerika," and "Ohne Dich" (they're also releasing a fourth in February called "Keine Lust.") They then claim their song "Du Hast" is translated as "You Hate"...that's just plain wrong. And the German imperial uniform?? That's wrong too; it's an original stage outfit, not a real uniform of any sort. The article also claims that the song "Amerika" is generic European anti-American politics. The song isn't about politics at all, it's about American culture. Next we have the “Links-2,3,4” song with it's supposed goose-stepping, the song is military themed, and as it happens, militaries march, what of it?? The song is actually about their left-leaning views, rather than right wing fascism, this is not a claim of the band, if one looks at the lyrics; it's quite obviously true.
The use of Leni Reifenstahl’s clips doesn’t really mean anything. The clips were well-made and by a talented director, there’s just this general negativity about anything having to do with Germany in the 30’s or 40’s. The popular German band Kraftwerk had their song “Autobahn” …that was really successful; the Autobahn was commissioned and constructed by the Nazis (forced labor was even used in its construction), does that make Kraftwerk fascists?? Clearly not.
The Rammstein logo is not a swastika, it looks like a “+” symbol with an “R” to the left of it. The R is quite obviously for Rammstein and the + is what they use for the “t” in Rammstein. Using the logic that any cross must be associated with the swastika would be real bad news for all those churches that display a crucifix.
Rammstein has clearly used provocation towards the media before, but I don’t believe they’re flirting with a Nazi image and pretending to be martyrs. The claims that they were Nazis began before the majority of this so-called fascist imagery was used. Their first album “Herzeleid” which is nothing more than the band members shirtless against the backdrop of a strange flower of some type… supposedly made them look like Aryan poster boys… maybe it’s worth pointing out the fact that Richard Kruspe Bernstein, the founder of the band, is married to a Jewish woman…
I don’t think they at all go with fascist imagery, but rather since some ill-informed people think they have something to do with fascism, they filter out anything that indicates otherwise, so they only see what they want to. I’ve cite the example of Kraftwerk, if one looks (too) carefully at their songs, their image, cover-art, etc…I’m sure it would be just as easy to find allusions to the Nazis.

Yeah, I wanted to mention Laibach (which is also, incidentally, the German form of 'Ljubljana', capital of Slovenia), but Randy has beaten me to the punch. Laibach use fascist imagery rather intelligently, and their music is interesting in a sort of conceptual way though for me, truth be told, a very little goes a very long way.

Rammstein operate at a much less exalted intellectual level. But I don't think they can fairly be called a neonazi band. (Even leaving out-and-out neonazi/skin bands to one side, Böhse Onkelz are probably more guilty of extreme-right kokettieren than are Rammstein.) Whoever mentioned Marilyn Manson has got it about right - Rammstein is rather juvenile provocation and, in Germany, nothing provokes quite like a whiff of the brown.

Oddly, Rammstein are, I hear, hugely popular in Russia.

BTW, if you read this Randy, would you mind posting (in text form) the link to your post about Laibach? Abiola's comments box disallows HTML. Thanks!

I know a bit about metal.

I definitely think that Rammstein is using fascist imagery for shock value or because they are somehow fascinated that the grandiose and martial aspects of it all. I don't think they're even being ironic, ala Laibach (rammstein just isn't an intellectual kind of band) . They're just using imagery that excites them, i think much like a lot of grindcore bands go on and on about cannibalism, gore and dismemberment without practicing what they preach !

The nazi metal scene does exist but contrary to what was said earlier it's not that much a scandinavian phenomenon.

While scandinavia was very important for an underground genre known as "black metal" during the 90s, the nazi angle has been taken most seriously in countries like Russia/Ukraine/Belarus , etc, where being into metal is almost *synonymous* with being a hardcore racist.

The situation in western europe and north america is a bit more complicated but i certainly have no problems going to underground metal shows here in Quebec.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Notes for Readers